Paul Conway
Tytuł
Cytowane przez
Cytowane przez
Rok
Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach.
P Conway, B Gawronski
Journal of personality and social psychology 104 (2), 216, 2013
5042013
When does feeling moral actually make you a better person? Conceptual abstraction moderates whether past moral deeds motivate consistency or compensatory behavior
P Conway, J Peetz
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38 (7), 907-919, 2012
2692012
Gender differences in responses to moral dilemmas: a process dissociation analysis
R Friesdorf, P Conway, B Gawronski
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 41 (5), 696-713, 2015
1942015
Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations
JM Tybur, Y Inbar, L Aarøe, P Barclay, FK Barlow, M De Barra, DV Becker, ...
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (44), 12408-12413, 2016
1182016
Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making.
B Gawronski, J Armstrong, P Conway, R Friesdorf, M Hütter
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 113 (3), 343, 2017
922017
Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers
GJD Conway P, Goldstein-Greenwood J, Polacek D
Cognition, 2018
742018
When virtue leads to villainy: Advances in research on moral self-licensing
DA Effron, P Conway
Current Opinion in Psychology 6, 32-35, 2015
672015
The strategic moral self: Self-presentation shapes moral dilemma judgments
SC Rom, P Conway
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 74, 24-37, 2018
632018
Judging those who judge: Perceivers infer the roles of affect and cognition underpinning others' moral dilemma responses
SC Rom, A Weiss, P Conway
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 69, 44-58, 2017
612017
Reading Dilemmas in a Foreign Language Reduces Both Deontological and Utilitarian Response Tendencies
R Muda, P Niszczota, M Bialek, P Conway
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 44 (2 …, 2018
412018
The political domain appears simpler to the politically extreme than to political moderates
J Lammers, A Koch, P Conway, MJ Brandt
Social Psychological and Personality Science 8 (6), 612-622, 2017
372017
Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results.
JF Landy, ML Jia, IL Ding, D Viganola, W Tierney, A Dreber, ...
Psychological Bulletin 146 (5), 451, 2020
352020
Not just bad actions: Affective concern for bad outcomes contributes to moral condemnation of harm in moral dilemmas.
CJ Reynolds, P Conway
Emotion 18 (7), 1009, 2018
352018
Effects of incidental emotions on moral dilemma judgments: An analysis using the CNI model.
B Gawronski, P Conway, J Armstrong, R Friesdorf, M Hütter
Emotion 18 (7), 989, 2018
342018
Paradoxical effects of power on moral thinking: why power both increases and decreases deontological and utilitarian moral decisions
A Fleischmann, J Lammers, P Conway, AD Galinsky
Social Psychological and Personality Science 10 (1), 110-120, 2019
232019
Reflecting on God's will: Reflective processing contributes to religious peoples' deontological dilemma responses
MZ J McPhetres, P Conway, JS Hughes
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 79, 301-314, 2018
232018
Clarifying gender differences in moral dilemma judgments: the complementary roles of harm aversion and action aversion
J Armstrong, R Friesdorf, P Conway
Social Psychological and Personality Science 10 (3), 353-363, 2019
222019
Understanding responses to moral dilemmas: Deontological inclinations, utilitarian inclinations, and general action tendencies
B Gawronski, P Conway, J Armstrong, R Friesdorf, M Hütter
Social psychology of morality, 91-110, 2016
202016
Distinguishing two meanings of moral exclusion: Exclusion from moral principles or principled harm-doing?
JM Olson, I Cheung, P Conway, J Hutchison, CL Hafer
Social Justice Research 24 (4), 365-390, 2011
182011
Not all who ponder count costs: Arithmetic reflection predicts utilitarian tendencies, but logical reflection predicts both deontological and utilitarian tendencies
NBP Conway
Cognition, 2019
172019
Nie można teraz wykonać tej operacji. Spróbuj ponownie później.
Prace 1–20