Sven E. Hug
Tytuł
Cytowane przez
Cytowane przez
Rok
A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants
L Bornmann, R Mutz, SE Hug, HD Daniel
Journal of Informetrics 5 (3), 346-359, 2011
2712011
Criteria for assessing research quality in the humanities: a Delphi study among scholars of English literature, German literature and art history
SE Hug, M Ochsner, HD Daniel
Research Evaluation 22 (5), 369–383, 2013
702013
Citation Analysis with Microsoft Academic
SE Hug, M Ochsner, MP Braendle
Scientometrics 111 (1), 371–378, 2017
612017
Four types of research in the humanities: Setting the stage for research quality criteria in the humanities
M Ochsner, SE Hug, HD Daniel
Research Evaluation 22 (2), 79-92, 2013
532013
The coverage of Microsoft Academic: Analyzing the publication output of a university
SE Hug, MP Brändle
Scientometrics 113 (3), 1551-1571, 2017
472017
Indicators for research quality in the humanities: opportunities and limitations
M Ochsner, SE Hug, HD Daniel
Bibliometrie-Praxis und Forschung 1, 2012
472012
Research Assessment in the Humanities. Towards Criteria and Procedures.
M Ochsner, SE Hug, HD Daniel
Springer, 2016
39*2016
Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis
L Bornmann, R Haunschild, SE Hug
Scientometrics 114 (2), 427-437, 2018
382018
A framework to explore and develop criteria for assessing research quality in the humanities
SE Hug, M Ochsner, HD Daniel
International Journal for Education Law and Policy 10 (1), 1, 2014
382014
The future of research assessment in the humanities: bottom-up assessment procedures
M Ochsner, S Hug, I Galleron
Palgrave Communications 3 (1), 1-12, 2017
302017
Setting the stage for the assessment of research quality in the humanities. Consolidating the results of four empirical studies
M Ochsner, SE Hug, HD Daniel
Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 17 (6), 111-132, 2014
182014
The number of linked references of publications in Microsoft Academic in comparison with the Web of Science
R Haunschild, SE Hug, MP Brändle, L Bornmann
Scientometrics 114 (1), 367-370, 2018
112018
Humanities scholars’ conceptions of research quality
M Ochsner, SE Hug, HD Daniel
Research Assessment in the Humanities, 43-69, 2016
112016
Entwicklung von Qualitätskriterien für die Forschung in den Geisteswissenschaften: Eine Explorationsstudie in den Literaturwissenschaften und der Kunstgeschichte
SE Hug, M Ochsner, HD Daniel
Qualität in der Wissenschaft 4 (4), 91-97, 2010
112010
Assessment Criteria for Early Career Researcher's Proposals in the Humanities.
M Ochsner, SE Hug, HD Daniel
ISSI, 105-111, 2017
52017
Research Assessment in the humanities: introduction
M Ochsner, SE Hug, HD Daniel
Research Assessment in the Humanities, 1-10, 2016
52016
The concordance of field-normalized scores based on Web of Science and Microsoft Academic data: A case study in computer sciences
T Scheidsteger, R Haunschild, S Hug, L Bornmann
arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.10141, 2018
42018
How legal scholars could change the landscape of research evaluation
SE Hug, M Ochsner
Collection Penser le droit. L’évaluation de la recherche en droit: enjeux et …, 2015
42015
Wie wollen und sollen die Geistes-wissenschaften Qualität und Leistung messen und steuern?
M Ochsner, SE Hug, HD Daniel
Für eine neue Kultur der Geisteswissenschaften? Pour une nouvelle culture …, 2012
42012
Bibliometrics-based heuristics: What is their definition and how can they be studied?-Research note
L Bornmann, S Hug
El profesional de la información (EPI) 29 (4), 2020
3*2020
Nie można teraz wykonać tej operacji. Spróbuj ponownie później.
Prace 1–20