| A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect. D Algom, E Chajut, S Lev Journal of experimental psychology: General 133 (3), 323, 2004 | 852 | 2004 |
| Selective attention improves under stress: implications for theories of social cognition. E Chajut, D Algom Journal of personality and social psychology 85 (2), 231, 2003 | 563 | 2003 |
| Participation in class and in online discussions: Gender differences A Caspi, E Chajut, K Saporta Computers & Education 50 (3), 718-724, 2008 | 291 | 2008 |
| Changes over time in digital literacy Y Eshet-Alkalai, E Chajut CyberPsychology & Behavior 12 (6), 713-715, 2009 | 252 | 2009 |
| The influence of personality on social participation in learning environments A Caspi, E Chajut, K Saporta, R Beyth-Marom Learning and Individual Differences 16 (2), 129-144, 2006 | 218 | 2006 |
| You can teach old dogs new tricks: The factors that affect changes over time in digital literacy Y Eshet-Alkalai, E Chajut Journal of Information Technology Education: Research 9 (1), 173-181, 2010 | 179 | 2010 |
| Visual coding for action violates fundamental psychophysical principles T Ganel, E Chajut, D Algom Current Biology 18 (14), R599-R601, 2008 | 153 | 2008 |
| Internet-assisted versus traditional distance learning environments: factors affecting students’ preferences R Beyth-Marom, E Chajut, S Roccas, L Sagiv Computers & Education 41 (1), 65-76, 2003 | 135 | 2003 |
| The influence of group size on nonmandatory asynchronous instructional discussion groups A Caspi, P Gorsky, E Chajut The Internet and Higher Education 6 (3), 227-240, 2003 | 132 | 2003 |
| In pain thou shalt bring forth children: the peak-and-end rule in recall of labor pain E Chajut, A Caspi, R Chen, M Hod, D Ariely Psychological science 25 (12), 2266-2271, 2014 | 65 | 2014 |
| Reclaiming the Stroop effect back from control to input-driven attention and perception D Algom, E Chajut Frontiers in psychology 10, 470902, 2019 | 59 | 2019 |
| Avoiding the approach trap: a response bias theory of the emotional Stroop effect. E Chajut, Y Mama, L Levy, D Algom Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 36 (6), 1567, 2010 | 52 | 2010 |
| Accurate visuomotor control below the perceptual threshold of size discrimination T Ganel, E Freud, E Chajut, D Algom PLoS One 7 (4), e36253, 2012 | 42 | 2012 |
| Are spatial and dimensional attention separate? Evidence from Posner, Stroop, and Eriksen tasks E Chajut, A Schupak, D Algom Memory & Cognition 37, 924-934, 2009 | 40 | 2009 |
| Response: When does grasping escape Weber's law? T Ganel, E Chajut, M Tanzer, D Algom Current Biology 18 (23), R1090-R1091, 2008 | 40 | 2008 |
| The pale shades of emotion: A signal detection theory analysis of the emotional Stroop task BM Ben-David, E Chajut, D Algom Psychology 3 (07), 537, 2012 | 33 | 2012 |
| Emotional dilution of the Stroop effect: A new tool for assessing attention under emotion. E Chajut, A Schupak, D Algom Emotion 10 (6), 944, 2010 | 31 | 2010 |
| Living books: The incidental bonus of playing with multimedia Y Eshet, E Chajut Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia 16 (4), 377-388, 2007 | 30 | 2007 |
| Pitch memory and exposure effects. MS Ben-Haim, Z Eitan, E Chajut Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 40 (1), 24, 2014 | 29 | 2014 |
| Can the Stroop effect serve as the gold standard of conflict monitoring and control? A conceptual critique D Algom, D Fitousi, E Chajut Memory & Cognition 50 (5), 883-897, 2022 | 20 | 2022 |
