Obserwuj
Gordon Pennycook
Gordon Pennycook
Assistant Professor, University of Regina
Zweryfikowany adres z uregina.ca - Strona główna
Tytuł
Cytowane przez
Cytowane przez
Rok
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response
JJV Bavel, K Baicker, PS Boggio, V Capraro, A Cichocka, M Cikara, ...
Nature human behaviour 4 (5), 460-471, 2020
33492020
The science of fake news
DMJ Lazer, MA Baum, Y Benkler, AJ Berinsky, KM Greenhill, F Menczer, ...
Science 359 (6380), 1094-1096, 2018
27852018
Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning
G Pennycook, DG Rand
Cognition 188, 39-50, 2019
1046*2019
Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy nudge intervention
G Pennycook, J McPhetres, Y Zhang, J Lu, D Rand
Psychological Science, 2020
10392020
Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news
G Pennycook, T Cannon, DG Rand
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 147, 1865-1880, 2018
7552018
Intuition, reason, and metacognition
VA Thompson, JA Prowse Turner, G Pennycook
Cognitive psychology 63 (3), 107-140, 2011
5892011
Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief
G Pennycook, JA Cheyne, P Seli, DJ Koehler, JA Fugelsang
Cognition 123, 528-534, 2012
5422012
On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit
G Pennycook, JA Cheyne, N Barr, DJ Koehler, JA Fugelsang
Judgment and Decision making 10, 549-563, 2015
4842015
Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking
G Pennycook, DG Rand
Journal of Personality 88, 185-200, 2020
4322020
Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality
G Pennycook, DG Rand
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (7), 2521-2526, 2019
4132019
What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement
G Pennycook, JA Fugelsang, DJ Koehler
Cognitive psychology 80, 34-72, 2015
3772015
The Implied Truth Effect: Attaching Warnings to a Subset of Fake News Headlines Increases Perceived Accuracy of Headlines Without Warnings
G Pennycook, A Bear, E Collins, DG Rand
Management Science, 2020
3242020
Everyday consequences of analytic thinking
G Pennycook, JA Fugelsang, DJ Koehler
Current Directions in Psychological Science 24 (6), 425-432, 2015
3072015
Belief in Fake News is Associated with Delusionality, Dogmatism, Religious Fundamentalism, and Reduced Analytic Thinking
M Bronstein, G Pennycook, A Bear, DG Rand, T Cannon
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 8 (1), 108-117, 2019
2992019
The brain in your pocket: Evidence that Smartphones are used to supplant thinking
N Barr, G Pennycook, JA Stolz, JA Fugelsang
Computers in Human Behavior 48, 473-480, 2015
2972015
Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online
G Pennycook, Z Epstein, M Mosleh, AA Arechar, D Eckles, D Rand
Nature, 2021
296*2021
The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking
VA Thompson, JAP Turner, G Pennycook, LJ Ball, H Brack, Y Ophir, ...
Cognition 128 (2), 237-251, 2013
2442013
Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines
B Bago, D Rand, G Pennycook
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2020
2352020
Atheists and agnostics are more reflective than religious believers: Four empirical studies and a meta-analysis
G Pennycook, RM Ross, DJ Koehler, JA Fugelsang
PloS one 11 (4), e0153039, 2016
2232016
Going against the herd: psychological and cultural factors underlying the ‘vaccination confidence gap’
M Browne, P Thomson, MJ Rockloff, G Pennycook
PLoS one 10 (9), e0132562, 2015
2202015
Nie można teraz wykonać tej operacji. Spróbuj ponownie później.
Prace 1–20