Would you deliver an electric shock in 2015? Obedience in the experimental paradigm developed by Stanley Milgram in the 50 years following the original studies D Doliński, T Grzyb, M Folwarczny, P Grzybała, K Krzyszycha, ... Social Psychological and Personality Science 8 (8), 927-933, 2017 | 69 | 2017 |
Let's Dialogue About Penny: Effectiveness of Dialogue Involvement and Legitimizing Paltry Contribution Techniques1 D Dolinski, T Grzyb, J Olejnik, S Prusakowski, K Urban Journal of Applied Social Psychology 35 (6), 1150-1170, 2005 | 45 | 2005 |
Why can’t we just ask? The influence of research methods on results. The case of the “bystander effect” T Grzyb Polish Psychological Bulletin 47 (2), 233-235, 2016 | 16 | 2016 |
Posłuszni do bólu D Doliński, T Grzyb Wydawnictwo Smak Słowa, 2017 | 14 | 2017 |
Beliefs about obedience levels in studies conducted within the milgram paradigm: Better than average effect and comparisons of typical behaviors by residents of various nations T Grzyb, D Dolinski Frontiers in psychology 8, 1632, 2017 | 13 | 2017 |
One serious shock versus gradated series of shocks: Does “multiple feet-in-the-door” explain obedience in Milgram studies? D Dolinski, T Grzyb Basic and Applied Social Psychology 38 (5), 276-283, 2016 | 12 | 2016 |
Is product placement really worse than traditional commercials? Cognitive load and recalling of advertised brands T Grzyb, D Dolinski, A Kozłowska Frontiers in psychology 9, 1519, 2018 | 7 | 2018 |
Cognitive structuring and obedience toward authority T Grzyb, D Doliński, J Trojanowski, Y Bar-Tal Personality and Individual Differences 133, 115-120, 2018 | 6 | 2018 |
Obtaining informed consent from study participants and results of field studies. Methodological problems caused by the literal treatment of codes of ethics T Grzyb Polish Psychological Bulletin, 2017 | 6 | 2017 |
Perpetrator as a potential victim. Does threatened retaliation from the victim reduce obedience towards authority? T Grzyb, D Doliński Psychologica Belgica 57 (2), 123, 2017 | 5 | 2017 |
Dialog jako metatechnika wpływu społecznego. Tryb komunikacji a efektywność techniki „liczy się każdy grosz” D Doliński, T Grzyb, J Olejnik, S Prusakowski, K Urban Studia Psychologiczne 40 (3), 127-152, 2002 | 5 | 2002 |
The (doubtful) role of financial reward in obedience to authority D Dolinski, T Grzyb The Journal of social psychology 159 (4), 490-496, 2019 | 4 | 2019 |
The use of mimicry to improve evaluation of unsought beverages W Kulesza, D Dolinski, M Migon, A Rizulla, M Gamian-Wilk, T Grzyb Food Quality and Preference 62, 137-143, 2017 | 3 | 2017 |
“This is my only request”–using the ‘Omega’strategy to boost the success of charity drives T Grzyb, D Doliński European Review of Applied Psychology 67 (4), 181-185, 2017 | 3 | 2017 |
Eksperyment terenowy w psychologii społecznej T Grzyb Warszawa: PWN, 2017 | 3 | 2017 |
Cena produktu jako narzędzie wpływu społecznego i sposoby jego wykorzystania w marketingu D Doliński, T Grzyb Marketing i Rynek, 2-7, 2007 | 3 | 2007 |
Nastrój, emocje i ich wykorzystanie w marketingu T Grzyb, D Doliński Marketing i Rynek, 9-13, 2006 | 3 | 2006 |
Temporal aspects of the chameleon effect and hospitality: The link between mimicry, its impact, and duration W Kulesza, D Dolinski, K Szczęsna, M Kosim, T Grzyb Cornell Hospitality Quarterly 60 (3), 212-215, 2019 | 2 | 2019 |
Attitudes, behavior, democracy, and dialogue K Byrka, T Grzyb, D Dolinski Democracy in dialogue, dialogue in democracy, 139-157, 2016 | 2 | 2016 |
Wpływ społeczny w marketingu D Doliński, T Grzyb Marketing i rynek, 14-18, 2005 | 2 | 2005 |